Your doctor would let me ask you something, the situation of the 400 d's stars while you focus point selection is the point on the left then it is difficult also in sight, no strokes, full-out is mainly, your doctor would have experience to share with you.
the focus point. Why must need more?
I recently changed from the 40 d to 7 d after almost two years of sticking. feeling generally "very good". But one thing I do not understand why the 7 d need to focus points? as with the 9 point AF on the 40 d I saw enough that why on the 7 d they do to 19 af point sailings? even more advanced line up to 45-51 focus points. (normally I just focus here on heart and stroke course General 1/2 shutter button then the layout)
looking forward to the uncle's household this problem love this prize.
the uncle on the answer I have yet to see "licensing agreement" to:D. When taking pictures, I see so many focus points as difficult, because much of the focus in that it "is not the subject.
@testdasi: Add me to know the score of the Center stroke 40 d autofocus capability, fast, good morning vàddo. so the doctor said the focus point used properly the focus position I saw "not reasonable". Plus sometimes point to focus upon the layout does not coincide the af point would (because both the 40 d and 7 d af point cross layout add up 4 corners are not the focus point).
@ K $ AStudio: technology. but that technology is nothing more than? I love this over here for. )
@testdasi: you true or a joke?
What I said is that when using the AF-S with many points. When shooting motion then use AF-C? A has to "guess" the AF points would next will be used (e.g. based on the change of focus points can infer is that the object is moving from right to left and off/on the plane with the speed would it then for the lens to that). Of course that still could be wrong but is certainly more accurate than your doctor uses a point center and then try to point it to stick to the subject.
Taam point accurate, quick and best doesn't mean you have to take at that point. In normal lighting conditions, the sensitivity of all the bright spots are enough to be able to capture. Bright spot between just mostly used with lens password (e.g. Tamron 18-270 or Sigma 50-500, first tele only f 6.3) and/or with very weak light conditions. With the big guns, the lens would also be used.
More AF points then likely stick to subject the focus points should be higher when there is less point. Also I wanted to know specifically why adjust the focus after the layout is not the best, then read this article back home.
http://visual-vacations.com/Photogra...pose_sucks.htm
The more I read your post I see I like examples of ISO. :D
@testdasi: I still think you're kidding about service compared the technology to eliminate noise:D.
I don't use nikon should not know af-s, af-c, af-a it as at all. but nobody in canon-servo when photographing moving (in this mode, we always put the focus point was picked up on the subject and move along with the the subject and its collectors to see through it was me "as a man") when I only use this one af point.
I said I would like some pictures I take as an example!
Your children have 11 points in focus that you are claiming for more because sometimes what you need it's still empty.
Many focus points doesn't mean you have to use all of them for a production where!
Wishing you fun and many beautiful photo!
